Verse 1
Section 3: The Earthly Apocalypse (chapters 12-20)
This vision begins with ch. 11:19
Chapter 12 - The Underlying Conflict (Woman on the Moon)
The Glorious Woman With Child, - Revelation 12:1-2
The Great Red Dragon, vv. - Revelation 12:3-4
The Man Child, vv. - Revelation 12:5-6
The Spiritual War, vv. - Revelation 12:7-9
Rejoicing In Heaven, vv. - Revelation 12:10-11
The Dragon Persecuted the Woman, vv. - Revelation 12:12-17
- - - - -
A great sign appeared in heaven -- This may be the beginning of “the seven signs” of the Revelation.
This is a special theological term (sēmeion) used often in John’s Gospel (cf. John 2:11, John 2:23; John 3:2; John 4:54; John 6:2, John 6:14, John 6:30; John 7:31; John 9:16; John 10:41; John 11:47; John 12:18, John 12:37; John 20:30). It now appears seven times between Revelation 12:1 and Revelation 19:20 —three times of signs in heaven (cf. Revelation 12:1, Revelation 12:3; Revelation 15:1) and four times of signs on the earth (cf. Revelation 13:13, Revelation 13:14; Revelation 16:14; Revelation 19:20). - Utley
in heaven . . In Revelation the word heaven was employed to denote governments and authorities. The Lord Himself so used the word in his own description of the destruction of Jerusalem in referring to "great signs in the heavens," and "stars falling from heaven"- a symbolic reference to the casting down of the Jewish and Roman rulers and authorities. - Walace
heaven . . The place where God dwells. The Greek word ouranos can mean sky or heaven. - FSB
a woman . . The woman represents the righteous remnant of Israel, who gave Christ to the world, v. - Revelation 12:5 Micah 5:3 , and who (as the church) will be persecuted by the Dragon (Satan), the Beast (Rome), the False-Prophet, and BABYLON, the harlot.
The woman is not Mary, not yet the church, but God’s faithful (which included Mary). The Tree in Roman 11 (see Romans 11:7 -36 ff . Psalms 107:2 The redeemed of the earth. They are called the "remnant" in Revelation 11:13
...this woman represents the true people of God (cf. Revelation 12:1-6), but in Revelation 12:13-17 she will be the NT people of God fleeing from the wrath of the dragon. - Utley
In New Bible Commentary George R. Beasley-Murray said, “Religious people of the ancient world would have seen in the travailing woman a goddess crowned with the twelve stars of the zodiac; a Jew would have understood her as Mother Zion (see Isaiah 26:16, Isaiah 27:1; Isaiah 49:14-25; Isaiah 54:1-8; Isaiah 66:7-9), but for John she represented the ‘Mother’ of the Messianic community, the believing people of God of old and new covenants” (p. 1441).[ Utley]
woman . . The faithful people of God, from whom the Messianic son comes (v. 5). - NIVZSB
The sun . . = A picture of her glory.
moon under her feet . . A picture of her exaltation over authorities and civil powers.
Twelve stars - helps us to remember this is in ch. 12.
The sun, moon, stars = the light for the earth.
“twelve stars” Here again our presuppositions drive the interpretation: (1) if it is OT then it refers to the twelve Jewish tribes; (2) if it is intertestamental apocalyptic literature it refers to the signs of the zodiac; and (3) if it is NT then it refers to the twelve Apostles. Twelve is the regular biblical symbolic number of organization.
However, the meaning of chapter 12 is not conditioned on a proper identification of John’s symbolism, but the central truth of the context. This principle must be maintained. We must not (1) push the details; (2) choose some things literally and some things symbolically; or (3) force our interpretations into our historical setting. - Utley
sun … moon … twelve stars . . Recalls Joseph’s dream in Genesis 37:9.
- - - - - - - - - - -
Colin Nicholl in his book The Great Christ Comet: Revealing the True Star of Bethlehem, shows the woman in Revelation 12 as the zodiac Virgin, who is clothed with the Sun only around Sept. 15, and only had the moon under her feet [in this time period ] in B.C. 6, thus he sees this as a reference to the birth of Jesus giving us a time table for the real "Christmas."
- - - - - -
BOOK REVIEW
As a Christian and an astronomer, it’s only natural I should have a keen interest in the mystery of the Star of Bethlehem. While I’ve never done any original research on the topic, I’ve followed new developments from a distance over the years. And each time it appears all plausible explanations have been exhausted, someone comes up with a fresh idea.
Now we have a lengthy treatise written by an academic. Will we be surprised again?
Skeptic Turned Believer
I have to admit I started Colin Nicholl’s The Great Christ Comet: Revealing the True Star of Bethlehem with considerable skepticism. Quickly perusing the book before I began reading in detail, I noticed Nicholl adopts 4 B.C. as the date of Herod’s death. While this has been the consensus view among historians, recent scholarship throws this dating into doubt (more on this below). Nicholl is obviously aware of this debate, but seems overly dismissive of challenges to the consensus. I feared if he lacked careful attention to this important point, his scholarship on other points would be similarly weak.
I’m happy to report, however, that I was wrong in my initial assessment of The Great Christ Comet. Unquestionably, Nicholl is a deeply knowledgeable and meticulous biblical scholar. Nearly every page contains multiple footnotes, often to obscure books and scholarly journals. But he is also humble. He acknowledges early on that the study of the mystery of the Star of Bethlehem requires expertise in multiple disciplines including biblical studies, Ancient Near Eastern (ANE) history, and astronomy. I’m impressed he dialogued with multiple astronomers while working on this book. Gary W. Kronk, a leading expert on comets, wrote the foreword.
The input from astronomers is evident in the high quality and great depth of discussions relating to the technical aspects of astronomy. Nicholl carefully explains the basic motions of celestial bodies in the night sky, always with attention to details relevant to ANE observers. He also does a very good job explaining the anatomy, orbital mechanics, brightness changes, and visual appearances of comets. Nicholl often draws on detailed historical accounts of bright comets, including many beautiful illustrations; the visual impact of a celestial phenomenon is an important part of the story of the Star. I couldn’t find any obvious errors in the book’s astronomy content.
Biblically Focused, Persuasive Storyteller
The biblical text is Nicholl’s main source material. Early on, he makes a solid case that the nativity narrative should be taken as describing real historical events. Not only does he make use of the detailed description of the Star in Matthew 1:18 – Matthew 2:18, but he also brings in Numbers 24:17, Isaiah 9:2, and Revelation 12:1-5. Though Kronk says in the foreword that Nicholl is the first to tie the Revelation passage to the star, this isn’t the case. In chapter 4, Nicholl actually states Ernest L. Martin did so in The Star of Bethlehem: The Star that Astonished the World, as well as Frederick A. Larson, likely influenced by Martin, in his The Star of Bethlehem documentary.
I’m not spoiling the conclusion by telling you Nicholl strongly advocates the comet explanation for the Star; that much is evident on the book’s cover. Before presenting his own theory, he critiques other well-known proposals. These include various conjunctions between Jupiter and other planets or stars, a nova or supernova, meteors, and an ordinary star. He also notes that the 12 B.C. apparition of Halley’s comet, which some have identified as the Star, is much too early to be consistent with the biblical chronology. I find his critiques to be persuasive.
Nicholl is a good storyteller. As I read through each chapter I had the impression he was retelling the story of how he’d worked as a detective to solve the mystery of the Star, carefully sifting through subtle clues bit by bit to arrive at a final, inescapable conclusion. Although at times the material can be technical and the pace slow (with some very long footnotes!), I think he manages to maintain the average reader’s interest most of the time.
Theories and Chronologies
Without giving away the whole story, I’ll briefly summarize Nicholl’s theory. Only a comet, he argues, can do all the things the Star is reported to have done in the nativity texts—leading the Magi to Jerusalem, then to Bethlehem, then to the specific house in which the Christ child lay. I must admit I was astonished when I read Nicholl’s description of the celestial sign he says prompted the Magi to make their long journey to Jerusalem. I won’t spoil the surprise by revealing it here!
Nicholl even gives the orbital elements of the “Christ Comet.” This is quite an achievement. With these, anyone with modern planetarium software can follow its path across the ancient skies and confirm that it did everything Nicholl claims for it.
I need to say a few words about the timing of the Christ Comet. As noted above, Nicholl accepts the consensus dating of Herod’s death (4 B.C.). In 2009 Andrew Steinmann, professor of theology and Hebrew at Concordia University, published a paper in Novum Testamentum titled “When Did Herod the Great Reign?” in which he presents a case for Herod’s death occurring in 1 B.C. There are many subtleties in this debate, such as whether one should count partial years in calculating the length of a king’s reign and which lunar eclipse is relevant to Herod’s death. In my opinion, Steinmann presents a compelling case for the 1 B.C. date.
On this accounting, Jesus was born in 2 or 3 B.C. Nicholl’s birthdate of 6 B.C., then, is excluded in the new chronology. His estimate is based on the celestial event described in Revelation 12. So there are actually two possible dates: September 11, 3 B.C. or September 15, 6 B.C. Thus, there is a simple fix to Nicholl’s chronology—just advance his dates by three years!
Mystery Solved?
So, has Nicholl finally solved the mystery of the Star? I’m tempted to say he has. But until an independent reference to the Christ Comet is discovered in the historical record, I would have to call his theory a speculative historical reconstruction—albeit a sophisticated one that may be the most plausible offered to date.
Historians, take note: even a single brief note of a comet appearing at a certain date and in a particular constellation consistent with Nicholl’s theory would be enough to confirm it.
Colin Nicholl. The Great Christ Comet: Revealing the True Star of Bethlehem. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2015. 368 pp. $40.00.
Guillermo Gonzalez is an assistant professor of astronomy at Ball State University. He is the co-author of The Privileged Planet: How our Place in the Cosmos is Designed for Discovery.
October 9th, 2015
- - - - - - - -
In response to this read the lengthy excellent review response by Jason Engwer (Nov. 9, 2015) in Amazon’s reviews of the book. The resonse took the view of a miraculous star.