Verses 1–3
NUMBERS - CHAPTER SIXTEEN
Verses 1-3:
The exact time and place of the events of this chapter is not know. Suffice it to say that it was at some point in the thirty-eight years’ wandering.
Korah was a relative of Aaron. He was the son of Kohath, a descendant of Izhar, brother to Amram the father of Aaron and Moses. He was of the family of the Levites whose duty it was to care for and transport the Tabernacle furniture and vessels. The place they occupied in Israel’s camp was to the south of the Tabernacle, adjacent to those under the standard of Reuben.
A possible explanation for the actions of Korah, and for those Reubenites who joined him, may be seen in the family lineage. Korah was of the family of lzhar, one of Korah’s older sons. But leadership of the Kohathites was assigned to Elizaphan, descendant of Uzziel, Kohath’s youngest son. Dathan and Abiram were the tribe of Reuben, Jacob’s first born son, and leadership of the nation was assigned to Judah. This was possibly a source of jealousy, in that the elder sons were thus passed over and denied their "rights" of leadership.
The location of the tents of Korah, Dathan, and Abiram in the assigned encampment order, and could have affored opportunity to discuss the fancied injustice in the denial of their "rights." (See chart, chapter 2.)
Korah apparently took the lead in this rebellion. He persuaded two hundred and fifty prominent men in the leadership council to join his conspiracy. He disguised his sedition under the pretense of piety. His argument: the entire nation was holy to Jehovah, and thus Moses and Aaron had no right to claim exclusive spiritual leadership.
Korah’s claim was in part true. The entire nation of Israel was holy, set apart from the nations around them, Ex 19:6; Le 20:26. And each Israelite was in a sense a priest to Jehovah. This partial truth is what made Korah’s rebellion so dangerous. It was mixed with enough truth to make it acceptable on the surface, but it was a serious falsehood because it failed to recognize God’s appointment. Korah based his claim to leadership rights upon national descent and fleshly lineage. God’s appointment to leadership rights was based upon spiritual qualities and godly character. ’
Korah’s rebellion typifies the constant warfare between flesh and spirit, Ro 7:14-23; 8:5-8; Ga 5:17; 4:22-31.