Verses 1–7
GENESIS - CHAPTER THREE
Verses 1-7:
The Scriptures do not indicate how long the paradisical state of innocence continued. Chapter 3 records what took place to terminate this state. The serpent (nachash, to hiss) was "more subtle" (arum, crafty, cunning; See Genesis 2:25 where the word is translated "naked") than any other creature of the animal kingdom. "Subtle" in the Septuagint translates the word phronimos, meaning "prudent," and it denotes "primarily one who has quick and correct perceptions, hence ’discreet,’ circumspect" (Thayer). This term does not point out a fault in the serpent, but denotes good qualities, although these good qualities were capable of being perverted and used wrongfully.
The Scriptures imply, but do not state, that Satan assumed
control of the serpent in order to approach and tempt (test) the first human pair. Subsequent use of "serpent" to designate Satan confirms this, see Revelation 12:9-15; Revelation 20:2; 2 Corinthians 11:14. It is possible that the subtlety of the serpent may have caused him to be filled with vain pride at his own wisdom and craft, and thus, seek to elevate himself to a position higher than that God ordained for him, much in the same manner Lucifer exalted himself (Ezekiel 28:17); thus the serpent became a willing tool in Satan’s hand.
"The serpent ... said unto the woman..." There is no indication that the woman was surprised when the serpent spoke to her. This implies that there was communication between mankind and some creatures of the animal kingdom. Eve did not recognize that it was Satan who controlled the serpent on this occasion. She was deceived, 1 Timothy 2:14; but this did not mean she was not guilty of sin.
This is the beginning of temptation. "Temptation" means "trial, test, to determine the validity or character of a thing or person." Temptation in itself is not sin. This is evident in Jesus’ temptation, Matthew 4:1-11. The sin lies in responding negatively to the trial.
The serpent introduced the temptation with a crafty question,
"Yea, hath God said..." This raised doubts in the woman’s mind regarding God’s goodness and fairness in providing fully for man’s needs. The woman rose to the bait, and added to what God had said. She quoted the Divine prohibition not to partake of the fruit bf the tree in the midst of the Garden, and added, "Neither shall ye touch it." The sacred record does not cite this prohibition. The second step in yielding to temptation is adding to what God has said.
The temptation was: that man might choose for himself what is good and what is evil. It was not that man and woman might know the difference between good and evil - this is implied in the very fact of the commands God gave. The serpent’s offer was that they might know for themselves, that they might be "as gods, knowing (for yourselves) good and evil." The temptation in Eden was the same as today: that man might become his own judge as to what is right and what is wrong and go his own way.
The forbidden fruit had a three-fold fascination for the woman. It was:
1) Good for food - the appeal to the physical or sensual nature;
2) Pleasant to the eyes - the appeal to the physiological, emotional nature;
3) Desired to make one wise - the appeal to the spiritual nature.
This corresponds to the three-fold temptation of Jesus, Matthew 4:1-11, at the beginning of His earthly ministry. Jesus passed the test, by accepting what God said in His revealed Word regarding each trial. He did not choose to do what He thought right, or even what He was capable of doing. He chose the will of God.
Eve failed the test. She was deceived, and voluntarily partook of the forbidden fruit. She could have said "No," but she chose to do what the serpent suggested, rather than what God commanded. She gave of the fruit to Adam, and he too did eat. Adam was not deceived; he was fully aware of the consequences of his actions, but he disobeyed God deliberately and by his own choice.
There is no way to know the shape or size or nature of the forbidden fruit. Some say it was the act of sexual intercourse. This is an unacceptable position, in view of God’s prior command to them to multiply and fill the earth with their offspring, Genesis 1:28; and God’s benediction on the marriage relationship in Hebrews 13:4, and Proverbs 5:18-19.
The man and the woman committed the fatal deed. Immediately they began to experience the promised results, but not the blessings they had anticipated. Their eyes were opened, to behold that they were not as they had been, innocent in their nakedness. Their mental "eyes" (understanding) were opened to see that they were no longer mentally or emotionally or spiritually innocent. At that point, their spirits became dead - separated from God by sin (Isaiah 59:1-2). Their minds began the process of degeneration and decay. And their bodies began to experience the debilitation process which would result in physical death. The nature of man became changed, in all aspects of his being. This changed nature is thus transmitted through the DNA molecules which carry the very seed of sin into the life-stream of all subsequent humanity, Romans 5:12; 1 Corinthians 15:22-23.
The man and the woman made an attempt to cover their guilt, by fashioning (tying or twisting) fig leaves together to form "aprons" (literally, girdles) to wear as clothing.